My writing group met recently for our monthly critiquing love- and slugfest. We know each other well enough to be pretty brutal and frank, and mostly that’s good, because it means that if everyone agrees that something’s finished, you can be sure we aren’t just being polite.
This month it happens that we’re all revising manuscripts, and we’re all weighing the pressure to be done with it against the wish for it to be perfect. And we discovered that we’ve all had the same experience at some point, of trying to ignore a subpar passage that we hoped would escape our editor’s/agent’s/reader’s notice.
When you aren’t certain, how do you decide whether a particular chunk is good enough? Some possible cringe tests:
- Imagine you’re interviewed on Fresh Air and Terry Gross chooses that passage to read out loud.
- Pretend it’s the only passage an old lover will read when he or she happens across it.
- Picture it printed in your obituary.
You get the idea—and I’ll bet you have some doozies. The point is, although not every passage will turn out to be quote-worthy, none of them should make you cringe.
______
Image: Cringe-Emoji, Theodore Palser, licensed under CC0 Public Domain
Worse, Terry asks you to read that section aloud yourself.
Posted by: Elizabeth | 05/31/2010 at 02:29 PM
Agreed: How would it sound in my own voice, which is the one voice that ostensibly knows every intended nuance of inflection?
Posted by: dmg | 06/01/2010 at 10:39 AM
Love this! And my critique group says the same thing--we hear each other as we write..."You can't LEAVE that!" :)
Posted by: Becky Levine | 06/01/2010 at 03:35 PM
I've been an editor for decades. I've lost track of the number of times I've either edited a passage or asked a writer to do so, then gotten the response, "I thought you might not be happy with that." My advice? If you aren't a completely obsessive writer and you think a passage is subpar, it probably is.
Posted by: Susan Chaney | 06/01/2010 at 10:58 PM